Outdoor fitness equipment can’t treat construction as unimportant to supervision
Recently, many people surprisingly found that some park and community outdoor fitness equipment have been updated, which contrast that a few years old fitness facilities. People enjoy the convenience at the same time but also worry that these outdoor fitness facilities can get a good management and timely maintenance.
Outdoor fitness equipment exists "treat construction as unimportant to supervision" phenomenon, which many people strongly reflect the problem. Many facilities often "one year new, two years old, three years remnant", and no one maintains fitness facilities or even causes personal injury. People expect that government can strengthen management so that national outdoor fitness facilities have the greatest benefits.
Last year in August, a 3-year-old child died when playing outdoor health fitness equipment. After the incident, it was found that outdoor fitness equipment doesn’t mark the lifetime of equipment and warning sighs. Later, the government found in the survey that many communities fitness facilities have over service life of many years and serious damage but no one to intervene. Who should be responsible for the maintenance and management of these outdoor fitness facilities? The residents are confused that who will ensure outdoor fitness equipment really serve the people?
According to the regulation of the State Sports General Administration, outdoor fitness equipment takes the measure of "who is responsible for who purchasing, who manage it for who received it". The sports administrative departments should clear who responsible for the outdoor fitness equipment use, maintenance and management to ensure the public welfare.
However, in reality, the application of outdoor fitness equipment is very positive, but the maintenance and management service do not keep up. If it neglects management for a long time, it not only affects the normal use but also brings security risks.
It is suggested that the government should increase investment and management in the outdoor fitness equipment to change the self-extinguished status. The government should clear fund and management, so that outdoor fitness facilities can better serve the public.
Outdoor fitness equipment exists "treat construction as unimportant to supervision" phenomenon, which many people strongly reflect the problem. Many facilities often "one year new, two years old, three years remnant", and no one maintains fitness facilities or even causes personal injury. People expect that government can strengthen management so that national outdoor fitness facilities have the greatest benefits.
Last year in August, a 3-year-old child died when playing outdoor health fitness equipment. After the incident, it was found that outdoor fitness equipment doesn’t mark the lifetime of equipment and warning sighs. Later, the government found in the survey that many communities fitness facilities have over service life of many years and serious damage but no one to intervene. Who should be responsible for the maintenance and management of these outdoor fitness facilities? The residents are confused that who will ensure outdoor fitness equipment really serve the people?
According to the regulation of the State Sports General Administration, outdoor fitness equipment takes the measure of "who is responsible for who purchasing, who manage it for who received it". The sports administrative departments should clear who responsible for the outdoor fitness equipment use, maintenance and management to ensure the public welfare.
However, in reality, the application of outdoor fitness equipment is very positive, but the maintenance and management service do not keep up. If it neglects management for a long time, it not only affects the normal use but also brings security risks.
It is suggested that the government should increase investment and management in the outdoor fitness equipment to change the self-extinguished status. The government should clear fund and management, so that outdoor fitness facilities can better serve the public.
评论
发表评论